Capture one app software#
Capture one app code#

This is particularly true of more delicate color grading, where Capture One really shines, along with processing RAW photos, where the RAW converter of the latest version seems particularly fine.

Overall, Photoshop does still give you more precise control over your complex edits, particularly when it comes to masking, but as subsequent versions of Capture One are released with an increasing number of complex tools, there is less and less need to go to Photoshop than there used to be, and I often find that edits can be entirely completed within Capture One. Really, they are different programs that are good for different things, rather than being direct competitors (although there is some overlap in editing), with Photoshop integration into Capture One meaning that it is now possible to prepare RAW images in Capture One using their excellent camera profiles, before exporting to Photoshop for your final, more complex edits. In Photoshop, it can be a pain to spot any issues you introduced during RAW conversion as you have to go back into Camera RAW to see the settings you used – Capture One has them displayed prominently from start to finish.Ĭapture One isn’t better than Photoshop in the strict sense – Photoshop has many more features and tools – but Capture One does complement Photoshop as a program for photo organization and for more basic edits, where it is much quicker than Photoshop. The one advantage of Capture One’s RAW processing is that it is not done in a separate window as with Photoshop – you edit photos in exactly the same way whether it is JPG, TIFF or RAW, which makes edits you don’t like far easier to undo. Whether you prefer Capture One or Photoshop for RAW processing is essentially down to personal preference of how you like your colors and contrast to look, so it’s a good idea to try them side-be-side with your own images to get a feel for this. Comparing Camera RAW vs Capture One, many photographers think that Capture 1 seems better with their RAW processing, and this might be the case for specialized cameras like the Fuji X series, where Capture One has specific profiles stored, but in general I don’t see any major difference. How it will translate to iOS though - and how the company plans to monetize the platform - remains to be seen.Both Photoshop and Capture One process RAW files very well. In the first step of that process, Capture One on M1 already showed significant improvements in most performance metrics. All these things are part of our plans and we have to ask how what we do fits into that workflow.” As part of our roadmap this year, we looked at M1 and cloud capabilities, and of course, we’re excited about the iPad door opening up and what that potentially means for a photographer’s workflow. Expertise from creating customized color profiles for more than 400 cameras, combined with our relentless dedication to creative freedom has brought recognition to Capture Ones workflow, our exceptional color handling, and precision editing tools.

We’re just incredibly excited about the opportunities. Capture One continues to lead the way in RAW file image editing. “More importantly, we look at the future of how photographers in different categories can start to use multiple devices in their workflows.

Capture one app code#

“Firstly, the convergence of hardware means that we can take more and more of our code and reuse it across more and more devices and we are excited about the possibilities that opens up for us,” he said.

Capture one app software#

Speaking about the prospect, Orta said it was hugely exciting and noted that the convergence of hardware to Capture One as a software company meant that he and his team were able to take more of their code and see how it would manifest across multiple devices. The quotes below were not published in the original interview, but at the time Orta actually expressly noted the company’s excitement about developing Capture One for iPad.